<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Should Use Feedback Loops During Development</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.avantica.net/2009/03/23/facebook-needs-feedback-loops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.avantica.net/2009/03/23/facebook-needs-feedback-loops/</link>
	<description>Expert advice on software development, technology and nearshore outsourcing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 21:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: partrireect</title>
		<link>http://blog.avantica.net/2009/03/23/facebook-needs-feedback-loops/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[partrireect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openmountain.com/?p=539#comment-61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FANTASTIC!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FANTASTIC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbenedict</title>
		<link>http://blog.avantica.net/2009/03/23/facebook-needs-feedback-loops/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bbenedict]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openmountain.com/?p=539#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have heard a few people comment that the negative reaction is more a group-think problem.  There&#039;s probably some truth to that.  On the other hand, if the changes were better accepted, wouldn&#039;t that group-think movement have been about how people liked the changes?  

I agree that social networking enables momentum and over-reaction.  Does that mean that these sites will need to pay more attention to a smaller group of people instead of less attention?  A smaller group of people will be able to create a louder voice because everyone is online. 

Thanks for the nod on development process!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have heard a few people comment that the negative reaction is more a group-think problem.  There&#8217;s probably some truth to that.  On the other hand, if the changes were better accepted, wouldn&#8217;t that group-think movement have been about how people liked the changes?  </p>
<p>I agree that social networking enables momentum and over-reaction.  Does that mean that these sites will need to pay more attention to a smaller group of people instead of less attention?  A smaller group of people will be able to create a louder voice because everyone is online. </p>
<p>Thanks for the nod on development process!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.avantica.net/2009/03/23/facebook-needs-feedback-loops/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openmountain.com/?p=539#comment-51</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well... in general terms I would agree with you. if we are talking about &quot;normal&quot; or business applications, but a social network has a twist and this is that it responds to &quot;social&quot; models more than &quot;structured&quot; models. What I am saying is that your aproach is correct, but in this case, people in FB is succeptible to &quot;gossip&quot; , &quot;trends&quot; and vogue. In this case, I think the reaction is overestimated by a lot of people that might even like the changes, but as all their friends are also &quot;deniying&quot; it, and therefore, they join that group, without even agreeing completetly, you see. But for the rest, I completely agree with you that the right way to go in software development is to make prototypes (when possible) and add feedback loops.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; in general terms I would agree with you. if we are talking about &#8220;normal&#8221; or business applications, but a social network has a twist and this is that it responds to &#8220;social&#8221; models more than &#8220;structured&#8221; models. What I am saying is that your aproach is correct, but in this case, people in FB is succeptible to &#8220;gossip&#8221; , &#8220;trends&#8221; and vogue. In this case, I think the reaction is overestimated by a lot of people that might even like the changes, but as all their friends are also &#8220;deniying&#8221; it, and therefore, they join that group, without even agreeing completetly, you see. But for the rest, I completely agree with you that the right way to go in software development is to make prototypes (when possible) and add feedback loops.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeanne Benedict</title>
		<link>http://blog.avantica.net/2009/03/23/facebook-needs-feedback-loops/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeanne Benedict]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 01:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.openmountain.com/?p=539#comment-50</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

